Blog and News

Many organisations turn to RPO recruitment as a flexible alternative to building or expanding an internal hiring function, particularly when senior leaders remain accountable for delivery but internal hiring capacity is under strain. Some organisations value that flexibility. In practice, organisations can struggle with added friction or a loss of control as complexity increases.

What does flexibility mean in RPO?

In RPO recruitment, flexibility shows up in how responsibility and delivery adapt to changing business needs. Hiring speed and volume matter, but they rarely tell the full story.

In practical terms, flexibility in RPO recruitment can include adjusting hiring capacity without permanent headcount changes and reallocating ownership of specific parts of the recruitment process.

Through this distinction we can determine how confidently organisations plan future hiring demand, commit to delivery timelines, and allocate leadership attention.

When does an in-house recruitment model stop being flexible?

Internal recruitment teams work well when demand stays stable and hiring volumes remain within planned capacity. For talent leaders and operational stakeholders responsible for delivery, this balance often underpins confidence in the hiring function. Flexibility erodes as those conditions change, which limits how confidently leaders can plan resourcing for upcoming priorities.

Common signals include sustained vacancy backlogs and repeated use of short-term fixes, alongside over-reliance on individual recruiters with hard-to-replace knowledge. Over time, this pattern leaves hiring leaders feeling reactive instead of in control, managing pressure and losing the ability to plan. At that point, effort and capability rarely drive the problem. Structural limits within the in-house model drive the constraint and limit how far teams can look ahead when setting hiring priorities. This often forces leaders to focus on short-term delivery rather than future workforce planning.

Internal recruitment may still function as designed, but the operating model no longer aligns with how the organisation needs to hire, specifically when leaders need to forecast ahead while responding to immediate pressure.

What hiring pressures expose limits in existing recruitment models?

Certain conditions expose where existing recruitment structures struggle to remain flexible. These often include volume volatility where hiring demand fluctuates beyond accurate forecasting, geographic spread across multiple regions with distinct talent markets, and time-bound delivery requirements tied to fixed project or programme start dates.

These pressures do not automatically require RPO recruitment. They directly affect how confidently organisations commit to delivery plans. They often prompt organisations to review how responsibility and delivery are structured, particularly when leadership teams must commit to timelines without certainty over resourcing. At this stage, organisations typically shift focus from diagnosing hiring strain to selecting a model that supports future delivery commitments. The decision shapes how confidently they can plan for upcoming programmes or growth phases.

If you are weighing up different recruitment structures, looking closely at how RPO operates alongside existing teams can help clarify whether it supports future hiring plans.

Start a conversation on how your hiring model supports future delivery.
If you want to explore how RPO recruitment might integrate with your current structure, you can get in touch with ITHR Group’s recruitment experts to review your approach and clarify which model best supports your forward hiring plans.

How does RPO change responsibility and accountability?

One of the most misunderstood aspects of RPO recruitment is how accountability shifts once delivery responsibility moves outside the organisation. This moment often marks a turning point. Leaders reassess how much control they need to retain and how much delivery they can realistically delegate. This shift often creates a quieter frustration for hiring leaders, who remain accountable for outcomes while delivery responsibility moves elsewhere. RPO recruitment changes who owns delivery and where accountability sits. It operates as a distinct delivery model with its own ownership and governance requirements.

Depending on the model, responsibility for attraction, screening, process management, or stakeholder engagement can move partially or fully outside the organisation. This shift can change how quickly decisions can be made and where issues surface when hiring pressure increases. For some teams, this creates breathing space and allows leaders to refocus on priorities. For others, it introduces dependencies that require active management to avoid new bottlenecks.

Clear governance creates flexibility in this context by giving leaders confidence that decisions will hold up as hiring demand evolves and priorities change. Without clear governance, RPO recruitment often feels less flexible than an internal team, even if capacity increases. With the right structure, decision-making can become more predictable, which supports steadier workforce planning and clearer accountability over time.

When can RPO reduce flexibility instead of improving it?

RPO recruitment carries risk, particularly for organisations already under delivery pressure or scrutiny from senior stakeholders. When misaligned with organisational needs, it can reduce flexibility and increase friction.

This situation often arises when decision-making authority remains unclear or stakeholders expect full control without operational involvement.

In these scenarios, RPO recruitment can add layers instead of removing friction. Over time, this slows decision-making. It also makes it harder to respond when priorities change. Recognising these risks early allows organisations to make informed decisions and choose a model that preserves flexibility as priorities change, instead of revisiting the same structural questions later.

When is an organisation ready for RPO?

RPO recruitment tends to work best when certain conditions are already in place and when decision-makers accept that hiring accountability will change. These conditions do not guarantee success. They indicate if the organisation is realistically ready for the model.

Organisations often see better alignment when they have defined hiring priorities and workforce plans, along with clear ownership of hiring decisions.

Without these foundations, organisations limit flexibility gains regardless of provider capability, and decision-makers often feel exposed rather than supported. When organisations address readiness early, RPO recruitment is more likely to support longer-term hiring stability and provide a platform for future change.

When is RPO not the right hiring model?

RPO sits alongside several viable hiring options. In some cases, targeted use of contract recruitment, permanent recruitment support, or executive search may offer greater control with less operational change.

Organisations with low hiring volume, bespoke roles, or strong internal recruitment capability may find that selective external support provides sufficient flexibility without altering governance structures.

The key lies in matching the hiring model to the problem so organisations can move forward with a structure that supports delivery rather than continually revisiting the same constraints.

How should organisations assess RPO before committing?

Before engaging an RPO provider, organisations should step back and take a structured approach to assessment, drawing on a clear recruitment process that defines ownership, accountability, and decision points. This involves mapping current recruitment ownership and decision points, identifying where flexibility is genuinely required, and clarifying which responsibilities can be delegated.

This evaluation helps ensure that, if you adopt RPO, the model supports operational needs and avoids introducing new constraints, while reducing the risk of added complexity at a point when stability is needed most. It also provides a clearer basis for deciding how recruitment should support the organisation as it grows or changes direction.

What should decision-makers consider before choosing RPO?

RPO can offer flexibility, but only when it aligns with how the organisation operates and how decisions are made. Understanding suitability before implementation reduces risk and avoids repeated structural change later.

If you are reviewing different recruitment models or want to explore how RPO fits alongside other approaches, a detailed discussion based on your current hiring structure can help define a more stable path forward. You can discuss your hiring structure with a specialist to explore which model best supports future delivery. Understanding options early makes future hiring decisions easier to manage and easier to stand behind.

Discuss your hiring structure with a specialist.

When you’re ready to define the next stage of your recruitment strategy, reach out to the team at ITHR Group. A dedicated expert can help you evaluate your current priorities and identify the model that aligns with your goals, supporting confident long-term planning.